<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Elmbrook School Board Candidates Forum</title>
                <link>http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=a55dbc1f1a/height=//width=</link>
                <description><![CDATA[ Elmbrook School Board Candidates Forum]]></description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
                <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:08:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
                <ttl>1</ttl>
                <language>en-us</language>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:00 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:00:33 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Hey, everybody. Welcome to tonight's live blog coverage of the Elmbrook School Board's at-large candidate forum. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:00 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:00:53 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The forum will be underway very shortly. All candidates are in their places here at the district's central offices. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:01 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:01:42 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[About 30 audience members are in attendance, including some current School Board members, district staff and former School Board member and Brookfield mayoral candidate David Marcello. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:03 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:03:10 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The format will be as follows: each candidate will be introduced and have two minutes for opening remarks. They'll talk about why the want to run and then speak to their expertise. Then moderator Cheri Sylla will present 10 questions. Candidates will have 1.5 minutes to respond. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:03 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:03:54 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Questioning will rotate, giving each candidate a question to answer first and answer last. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:04 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:04:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[If time provides (this thing's slated for two hours), audience members will get to submit questions. Answers to those will be timed to one minute. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:04 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:04:32 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Lastly, candidates will have one minute for closing remarks. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:05 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:05:07 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[After tonight, the forum will be aired on Time Warner Cable channels 13 and 96 (though it seems we don't know when yet). ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:06 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:06:24 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff will open up the introductions.
<br/>He has 20 years of academic administrative experience... higher ed, mostly.
<br/>However, he's volunteered at each district his children have attended.
<br/>He's also got 20 years of consulting and experience as an adjunct professor. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:06 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:06:47 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["That represents a breadth and depth experience," he says. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:07 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:07:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[That's given him an in-depth understanding of issues involved with program development, student learning, asessment and balancing a budget. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:08 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:08:13 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next up is Beth Horneffer. She's got students at elem and middle school level. She was a pediatrician for 14 years in a private practice in Waukesha. "Obviously I have an interest in working with kids - in their health and wellness and their development." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:09 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:09:02 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She says she's got lots of problem-solving experience, including analysis. The private practice gave her experience in running a small business, which she believes will be helpful.
<br/>She's also volunteered in her children's classrooms. She's served on Burleigh's PTO and was curriculum chair there. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:09 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:09:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Participated in last year's financial planning committee for elementary schools, which gave her an intro into the district's financial problems and what's at risk (program cuts, larger class sizes, etc.)
<br/>"I feel it's very important for us to protect studnet learning." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:10 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:10:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt is next.
<br/>She's got students in district schools. Enjoys it.
<br/>Running because she's got support. Wants to focus on student learning, connection with the community and to be fiscally responsible.
<br/>"We're all taxpayers, and I don't know about you but I don't have a pot of gold burried in my backyard." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:11 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:11:10 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Says the best way to be involved is to "step up." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:11 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:11:38 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Her education is in development. She works in HR for Quad/Graphics, so she's on the "receiving end" of the products of many area districts. That's good experience, she said. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:11 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:11:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[As a manager for the past 10 years, she has experience making tough choices.
<br/>She prides herself on being accessible and plans to source residents in making decisions. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:12 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:12:04 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz is next. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:12 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:12:32 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's appologizing for using her notes. "This format does make me a little nervous." Jokes that using notes would be easier to put her at ease than imagining the audience in their underwear.  ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:13 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:13:34 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[To be on the board, she says, you need time and dedication. A few years ago, this would have been taxing on her family. Now, three kids are in college and the youngest is a junior at East. Feels that now is the time, because she's still connected to the district, but I have more time for he job. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:13 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:13:50 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's touting her experience... volunteering, leading Parent Network (especially recent drug collection) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:14 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:14:16 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["I do bring a unique perspective to the School Board." Dedicated. Sincere. "Given a challenge, I will find a resolution. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:14 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:14:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Onto Kathryn Wilson. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:14 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:14:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Board needs people with biz skills and organization knowledge. It has that. But it also needs someone who's focused on curriculum. That's her, she says. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:15 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:15:08 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She has children at several grade levels, ranging from special education to gifted. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:15 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:15:44 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Touting varying work and volunteering experience. She's active in the district and at church. She doesn't lose sight of the big picture. The big picture "sleeps under her roof." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:16:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Current financial challenges are an opportunity to rethink the district. Resume the lead as the best district in SE Wisconsin. "I would be honored to help lead this efffort as a memeber of the Board of Education." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:16:21 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler, incumbent, up next. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:16:43 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["All School Districts are in one business, and that's the business of student learning." all trying to enhance that. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:16:54 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Current budget woes are worst in his six years on the board. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:17 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:17:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Need to look for new revenues: K4, Open Enrollment, opening a charter.
<br/>Reduce expenses: multi-age elementary classrooms, new MS and HS high schools, distance learning, closing one or two elementary schools ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:17 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:17:42 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Asks how we expand student learning? That will be addressed tonight. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:18 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:18:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Board needs experience, he's got it. 19 years as a district resident. Lots of volunteer experience and, of course, his School Board experience, which includes committees, study teams, etc. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:18 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:18:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[First question up now. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:18 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:18:35 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer gets first question ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:19 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:19:09 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[It's "how would you accurately represent your constituents, give n that the residents of elmbrook include not only parents, but residents without children and those with kids in private schools." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:19 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:19:38 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Horneffer says having kids at all levels help make her aware of issues at each level, including the impact on student learning of board decisions.
<br/>She's a homeowner and a taxpayer and is concerned about property values. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:20:05 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She shares an anecdote about when she moved to the area, without kids, and was told to find a home in the area with the best district because it holds property value if you ever need to move and sell. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:20:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She thinks decisions need to be fiscally responsible. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:20:33 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Half her neighborhood attends parochial schools. She has close friendships with those people and has heard their voices and can listen to them. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:20:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt is up next. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:22 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:22:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["The groups that I think I can represent most accurately would be other parents with school age children in the district."
<br/>can also relate to teachers in the district. All her sisters-in-law are teachers. "So I really understand what it takes to be effective in the classroom, and what are some of the barriers and challenges that they have."
<br/>Can relate to taxpayers as one herself. She's a homeowner in a neighborhood with many families who raised their now-grown children here. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:22 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:22:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Also lives near families with kids in district.
<br/>"I think it's important to be able to reach out, to be able to listen to what all our constituents have to say and to balance." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:23 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:23:36 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz says she can represent all constituents. Knows many families, teachers and is out in the community trying to make it a better place for students, as a work environment and for families.
<br/>"I want our community to be a place where you want to live when you raise a family."
<br/>Doesn't matter if they go to public or private school... need to listen to their concerns and respect their input. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:24 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:24:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She says she can make a positive impact on the community as a whole by making herself available, getting out there and listening. She loves the community, which will help her represent it well all around. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:24 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:24:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson: strong public schools are everyone's business. blessed to live in a community with strong educational options. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:24 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:24:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Strong public schools are a backbone of the community. Impact property values and social atmosphere. Good schools make this a good community. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:25 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:25:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She wasn't even a cnadidate a week before she started hearing opinions from the entire community - all constituencies. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:25 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:25:40 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler is next - purpose of district is facilitating student learning. "if we do that, we provide optimal value for the community." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:26 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:26:18 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Need a long-range plan. Need to be committed to continuous improvement. Connected to constituents. Involve the community. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:26 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:26:31 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["there are a wide variety of constituents, and we strive to stay in touch with them." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:27 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:27:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff: "I represent no constituent organization, however i'm beginning to accumulate one." 
<br/>his daughter and her husband moved her. Shortly after that, he started attending board meetings and curriculum committee meetings. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:27 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:27:45 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[One underestimated challenge, he says: 'We are priviliged to have lived through what I call the early digital era and are rapidly moving toward what I call the advanced digital era." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:28 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:28:31 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[He's citing technological advances. "We've got to strengthen our discussion in regard to the advanced digital era and the technologies that children and youth are exposed to" and then form curriculum around that to meet their needs. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:29 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:29:10 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next question: how do you balance the above mentioned needs with efficient decision making? Do you think the School Board spends a disproportionate amount of time making a decision? ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:29 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:29:40 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt: says they don't spend too much time (has she been at the same meetings as me? just kidding) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:29 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:29:53 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's complimenting board process - the 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' model. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:30 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:30:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[There's a lot of pressure for decision making and quality services amid declining revenue. Need to take time and effort making these long-reaching decisions. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:30 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:30:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz: In general, when there's anything of concern, whehter at home, in the community... we always want resolution immediately. we're anxious to find an answer. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:31 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:31:34 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[But with the School Board, especially right now, huge decisions are looming. "I think that taking time to make these decisions with a lot of well-thought research behind it is crucially important. To rush a decision is to make a short-term fix. And a short-term fix can really turn into a disaster." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:31 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:31:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Her dad's a builder - he says it's better to build it right the first time than to have to fix it later. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:32 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:32:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Don't just want to fix it quick to satisfy constituents... need to take the time to make a long-term fix that will work for years to come. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:33 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:33:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson is up now. Need to balance long-term decision making with constituent demand for fast answers. Need to get all the necessary info to all involved parties first. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:34 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:34:06 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - Everyone involved in the decisions need all the info before making decisions. like it or not, this is a political process. It needs to be thorough. Where do we get the info? Administration... board members and committees (and their recommendations)... ad hoc advisory groups composed of community members... ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:34 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:34:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[... "Ultimately it comes to the board to discuss and make a decision, weighing everyything that we've heard, and that takes time." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:34 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:34:51 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[It can be frustrating, he admits. Sometimes he's the one that slows it down. "its a political process that takes time and I'm not sure there's a whole lot we can do to change that." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:35 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:35:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - Has attended many meetings and observed the process. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:35 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:35:31 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Much of the discussion occurs in committees. That takes time. Board members not assigned to hte committee go to committee meetings. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:35 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:35:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Board and administrators function at a higher quality than any he's observed. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:35 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:35:56 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[They're working to sustain Elmbrook's greatness. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:36 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:36:09 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[He's turning back to advanced digital technologies the board should act on. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:36 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:36:35 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Project Lead the Way is in its second year and doing well, thanks to the teachers involved, he says. There are similar programs that "await our discusssion and implementation in the very near future." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:37 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:37:08 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - agrees with others that quick decisions are appreciated, as long as they're made correctly. "I do think our School Board does a good job of being responsible to students and to parents and to staff, teachers, administrators and taxpayers." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:37 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:37:36 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Various board committees and five year financial planning commitees do good work to help understand information. "These committees allow a voice - an opportunity for everyone to express their opinions and be heard." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:38 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:38:04 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Larger issues can't be done individually. They need to be looked at comprehensively, that means committees, which means time.
<br/>"The desire is to handle things quikcly and efficiently, but we need to make sure we get it right." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:38 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:38:29 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Question three: "are you satisfied with the differentiated instruction that currently exists in our schools? That includes the gifted population and those enrolled in special education services." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:38 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:38:36 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Up first: Sandra Schultz ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:38 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:38:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's been researching this. She has four children. "If I can see a difference in how my children are motivated, or their learning styles, just imagine the classroom." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:39 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:39:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["I think you need differentiated instruction."
<br/>Recently spoke to a daughter who is an education major. Most of her coursework is heavily involving differntiated instruction. It's truly considered best practice and beneficial to the student.
<br/>Research agrees. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:40 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:40:07 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Many district teachers thorugh their own education process already do this. 'But I certainly would be an advocate for instruction, staff instrucditon, for continued differentiated instruction in the schools." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:40 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:40:45 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - this is a subject near to her heart, she says, as chair of gifted/talented advisory board. She's worked hard to bring board attention to this. District needs to differentiate to meet student needs. District has made progress and are more aware of the topic. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:41 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:41:19 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Staff are more informed about available resources. Still room for improvement. "never be satisfied." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:41 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:41:32 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - not every studnet learns the same. that means we need to differentiate instruction. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:42 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:42:13 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Is student getting it or not? Either way, what do we do about it? That's the crux. Look at behaviors that impact learning and adjust instruction to meet those behaviors. We need to use data to do this.  ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:42 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:42:55 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Interventions are crucial. This is a group effort between principals, instructional resource teachers and principals. this takes quality staff, which Elmbrook has. Good things do happen, he says. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:43 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:43:26 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - after undergrad and military, he taught in a good district in Philly. Taught from special education to gifted and talented and learned a lot about differentiation. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:43 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:43:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Teachers need to be prepared, but youngsters need to be programmed by technology they have access to. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:44 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:44:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Central had a guest speaker Jan. 18 that shared how students today are being programmed by modern tech. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:44 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:44:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[He says gifted and talented committee is working on a new tool that will help identify differnt students' needs. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:44 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:44:43 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - every kid needs to be challenged. we can always do better at that. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:45 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:45:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She sees how the schools are trying to meet those needs thorugh her involvement with Burleigh's curriculum. Currently, if students are meeting expectations, teacher and parents will intervene to support them. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:46 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:46:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["It's good to know that that algorythm is in place, and there's some uniformity in evaluating our kids and helping them reach their goals."
<br/>Differentiation depends on teachers, and they need training. Also depends on support teachers, who give one-on-one attention.
<br/>As board considers larger classes and multi-age classrooms, differentiation becomes more important. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:47 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:47:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - Agrees that multi-age classrooms and larger class sizes will make differentiation difficult. Again refers to her sisters-in-law, who are teachers. Two of three of them are in special eduaction and they've walked her through creating and Individual Education Plan. It's an "incredible team effort" to start where the student is, bring in right resources at right time to make sure student gets needed resources. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:47 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:47:37 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["That, to me, is reassuring as a parent." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:48 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:48:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[What she's not certain of, is how it goes for gifted and talented students. her limited understanding is that people aren't satisfied with that. leaning too heavily on parents who don't have the resources to stretch gifted students. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:48 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:48:40 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Question four: "How does the elimination of the QEO effect the district?" ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:49 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:49:03 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson is not sorry to see the Qualified Economic Offer go. It was part of a funding methodology that has long been out of usefulness. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:49 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:49:11 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Costs are rising quicker than revenues, meaning budget cuts. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:49 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:49:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[All that said, with no QEO, 'anything could happen' ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:49 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:49:42 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Higher salary demands are possible. 'what we have iether way is an unsustainable situation." need legislative action in madison to make the state's educational system more sustainable. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:50 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:50:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler says this is a favorite topic of his. He's complained "long and loud" about the QEO, which basically required districts to give a 3.8 percent raise to teachers while district could only raise taxes by 2 percent.
<br/> ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:50 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:50:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Arbitration rules as they are are stacked against the district. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:51 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:51:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["With rules stacked against us, we're probably going to lose."
<br/>Without the QEO, even in this tough economic time, settlements are still averaging at 3.8 percent.
<br/>We need a full overhaul of state educational funding, but that's a big challenge. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:52 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:52:13 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff says he's not really qualified to answer this. He has no insight or knowledge about it.
<br/>However, he's always been impressed with those involved in the process. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:52 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:52:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[District can look for grants to help make up for lost income, which it hasn't done yet. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:53 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:53:21 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Starting programs, like charters, could be cheap to implement and could qualify district for grants. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:54 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:54:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer is up - Wisco school finance laws don't work. Eliminating the QEO makes for uncertainty. She's hoping it will result in decreased costs. "Our teachers have generous benefit packages at this time." Whether we'll get decreased costs is uncertain.
<br/>Unsustainable formula has opened up the idea to a new idea: Charter Schools. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:54 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:54:25 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[People hear negatives about charters, but they're "starting to change things." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:54 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:54:48 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[They can hire teachers with comittment, dedication that work in a stimulating environment. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:55 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:55:11 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[It would only work if Charters had similar performance as high schools, but it could bring in extra enrollment and therefore revenue. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:55 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:55:37 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt has been researching why the QEO was put into place. It was all about adding controls to keep taxpayers from being asked to pitch in more to meet district costs. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:56 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:56:07 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Stepping back, what's the QEO's impact on the district's goal? "If we take away the QEO and that cap, will we be putting more effort and energy into the collective bargaining process?" ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:56 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:56:43 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Need to put effort toward that, but she's concerned that without the QEO, it will take a lot more effort and energy to negotiate and keep teachers satisfied, which will take away focus on student learning. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:57 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:57:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz says this is a tough question. She appreciates Elmbrook's good, hard-working, qualified teachers. However, district is in a difficult position as far as developing compensation packages.
<br/>She doesn't know everything about it, but she's asked those in her life who do. She needs more thought before making a well-educated statement. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:58:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[In this tough economy, it's hard to talk about compensation packages. Many people are losing their income, their jobs or their businesses.
<br/>Ultimately, students are paying for the decline in enrollment and state funding. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:58:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["It's a tough place to be" ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[7:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 1:58:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Question 5: "The curriculum planning committee has recommended that the board eliminate class rank at the high schools .... how would you vote on this recommendation and why?" ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:00 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:00:16 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - the crux is that in a high achieving district, class rank compares students to other mostly excellent students and distorts their achievement.
<br/>A 3.2 GPA in Elmbrook would put you at the 50 percent mark. If you were in a less highly achieving district, a 3.2 would likely put you well above 50 percent.
<br/>Some universities eliminate students for consideration for admission based on that class rank. Eliminating it would force universities to consider students on their full merit - test scores, extra curriculars, AP participation, etc. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:00 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:00:53 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[There are many high-achieving districts in the area that have eliminated Class Rank, and none of the mhave gone back of it. A majority of Class Rank Committee members voted to eliminate it... Ziegler says he agrees with them. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:01 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:01:36 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - Course selction should be based on how it will help you later. Unfortunately, course selection is often based on other factors, like how it impacts your class rank. He's unsure about the issue... would like to hear more discussion. "Quite honestly, I wouldn't have  clear direction." Can't say how he'd vote. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:02 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:02:35 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - has done alumni inteviews with college grads for the past decade, lending to an understanding of what it takes to get in to good schools. Many districts have gotten rid of class rank. Colleges use it as the sixth-most important piece of data in admissions. There are other things that play a bigger role, while Class Rank is jeapordizing Elmbrook students' futures. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:02 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:02:48 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[it would serve students and colleges better if Elmbrook got rid of class rank. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:03 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:03:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - having colleges evaluate students individually is ideal. But eliminating class rank is going to mean colleges need to do more work to contextualize students. Some colleges put too much weight on class rank, yes... so district should eliminate it, but it needs to be replaced with an equally important measure to help colleges contextualize it. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:04 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:04:05 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schlutz - agrees with Ziegler. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:04 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:04:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She just went through the college application process three times. All three of her kids checked the box to not include class rank. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:05 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:05:45 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[It makes colleges take a better look at the student in general.
<br/>There are a lot of qualified students here. She doesnt' want to see them not reap the benefits from their education based just on class rank when they'd be ranked higher if they went elsewhere.
<br/>This was the recommendation of the committee - they did the research and came to the board with a near-unanimous recommendation. She agrees. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:06 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:06:42 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - she was a member of the Class Rank Committee. She's glad candidates are educated about topic. She won't repeat what's been said, but she'll add a few things: class rank is a relic of bygone college admissions concept. Modern grading systems aren't intended to rank students by ability but to indicate whether or not they've met a certain level of achievement. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:07 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:07:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Elmbrook students are sometimes separated by one one thousandth of a percentage point, but they are ranked differently - that doens't make sennse, and it doesn't validly recognize achievement. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:07 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:07:32 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[(By the way, audience size has grown... about 50 people here, by my estimate) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:07 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:07:48 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next question: how does elmbrook adapt to current economy while continuing to strive for excellence? ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:08 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:08:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - that's a heavy question, he says. He served on committees with a district for nine years. That district decided to close three elementary schools]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:08 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:08:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[resoures were reallocated to move to the middle school concept and put a lot into career education.
<br/>"that's one option" ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:09 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:09:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bottom line- sometimes consolidation can be used to achieve excellence. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:10 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:10:02 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - need to start with the 5 yr financial plan. We can't just look at individual issues but look at how everything impacts everything else. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:10 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:10:51 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[The new enrollment management tool will help predict outcomes of increasing Open Enrollment, adding K4, closing a school. 
<br/>"these issues are very complicated and they all mix together." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:11 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:11:22 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[That tool will help. She's very grateful for its development. Need to look at all options to decrease expenditures and increase revenue and enrollment. Board members need to be connected to community to hear all the options out there. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:11 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:11:56 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - agrees with Horneffer - need to keep an eye on the financial planning process and use the enrollment management tool to its full ability to expand on district excellent and meet residents' expectations. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:12 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:12:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Must engage everyone possible on committee work, leave no stone unturned and look for creative ideas. Can't just be about cutting expenses, need to focus on creative ways to bring in revenues. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:12 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:12:43 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz - jokes that revenue cuts started by keeping the heat down in central offices (it is kinda cold in here...) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:12 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:12:57 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[a minute and a half isn't enough time to discuss this (something tells me she'll try anyway) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:13 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:13:38 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She supports looking for alternative revenue sources - charter schools, grant writing, alumni "potential" that isn't being tapped into (I'm assuming that means donations) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:14 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:14:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[We're too accustomed to doing things the same way. Some things haven't changed in decades. "While we're looking at the financial aspect of it and the budget, we need to look at some progressive options that really brings us to the next step" and provides new revenue sources.
<br/>(by the way, at the beginning of her response, she also said looking to current financial planning work is key) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:15 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:15:08 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - also nods to five year plan and enrollment management team and enrollment projection tool ,which will help model impact of decisions before they're made.
<br/>need to step back and get an end in mind. What do we want? Then how do we get there. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:15 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:15:40 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Instead, methods tend to focus on "putting out the fire" instead of looking at the big picture. The financial study teams are a step toward that, but we need to be looking at what we want to provide students and then look at ways and means to that end. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:16:03 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["Good leaders empower other people to take good ideas and then run with them."
<br/>District has a lot of people who have good ideas. Need to tap into them. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:16:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - this is the key issue facing the district. Declining enrollment means declining revenues. "We can't make cuts fast enough to adapt." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:16:50 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Previous speakers have echoed financial/enrollmetn study teams, charter shcools, schedule changes, distance learning. Have to look at everything... K4, too. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:16 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:16:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bottom line is the impact on student learning once the changes are made. 'That's goal one." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:17 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:17:14 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Have to remain in the business of ehancing studnet learning, which is tough to do while making cuts. but we've got to. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:17 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:17:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Financial study teams are going to give the board info. Need to set aside biases, review info seriously and try to formulate a plan that addresses budget issues while improving student learning. he doesn't have all the answers, he says, and is awaiting more info about these decisions. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:18 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:18:18 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next question: with tough financial times ahead, comment on busing and school closings ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:18 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:18:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - "no parent wants their school to close" but it has to be on the table because of lost revenue and excess capacity. need to look at possible cost savings. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:19 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:19:25 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Still, people have chosen where they live based on their proximity to schools. "closing a school would imapct everyone at the elemetnary level because it would require redistricting." it would be a last resort. Before doing that, she'd look at every other way to increase enrollment. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:20:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Student learning is at risk - if we can preserve what's going on in our students'  classrooms (music, foreign language, etc.), that's best. need to focus on finding revenues instead of cuts. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:20:26 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - closing a school is a last resort. Elmbrook is desirable, and closing a school could negatively impact that. need to focus on finding new revenues. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:20 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:20:50 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[A new product (charter?) could help expand student base and prevent school closure. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:21 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:21:27 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz - wants to see studies on busing. not ready to make an opinion on the elemination. Not a fan of school closings (who is? she asks), but she understands everything needs to be examined. "That's just where we are." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:21 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:21:47 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Study teams and the enrollment tool will help make these decisions. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:22 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:22:35 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's been attending meetings to follow the analysis of whether school closing really is a benefit of the district.
<br/>There are other options out there; Charters, for instance.
<br/>She hopes to find other revenue-generating ideas to avoid closing a school but agrees that all stones need to be turned. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:22 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:22:45 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson -she'll start with busing, because she says it's the easier question. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:23 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:23:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[She's going to wait and see what the Sherif Dept.'s walking study says, but it's got to be about safety. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:23 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:23:53 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[As far as school closing - board can't make that decision without community input. Boundaries and home values will be impacted (redistricting).
<br/>However, need to look at all options for due dilligence, and school closing is one of those options. She'll wait for enrollment management study team. Residents deserve all the facts. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:24 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:24:37 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - busing is a safety issue. So far, the sherif has said Elmbrook is unsafe. "until he changes his mind, we have to bus." He as an adult wouldn't want to try to walk to some of the elems near busier places. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:24 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:24:58 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Few high schoolers ride the bus. It's frustrating, but there's not a clear answer. It would be nice to do something because it costs $2 million a year. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:25 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:25:13 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Closing a school needs to be considered, but only as a last resort. It would be the most difficult decision he's ever made. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:25 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:25:36 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Looking to enrollment management study team and will 'sincerely review their recommendation and try to undrestand their rationale."
<br/>his personal opinion is that he wouldn't watn to close a school, but he'll listen to the team. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:26 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:26:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - Closing a school or two might be one of the better choices on the table. "If this district expects to be of high quality in the advanced digital era, it needs to be synchronized to" advanced technological needs. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:27 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:27:07 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[He's citing a program like PLTW called Biomedical Sciences. "That's something that has to be developed." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:27 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:27:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[(I have never typed this quickly for this long. Yikes!) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:27 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:27:56 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next question: how can Elmbrook distinguish itself to both attract and retain good teachers and new families. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:28 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:28:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - reputation of the district is very strong and positive. "We have that going for us, but I think we tend to keep it a secret." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:28 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:28:35 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Word-of-mouth is strong, but Elmbrook hasn't capitalized on it yet.  ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:29 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:29:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[As noise grows about closing schools, it could be negatively impacting the perception of potential new families. Thinks fewer families attended recent kindergarten open houses because of news about potential school closings.
<br/>Need to be positive about great thigns going on so people know about it. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:30 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:30:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[In terms of teachers - it's not a problem... we've got great teachers. But we need to retain them. This means support from famililes, district.
<br/>"I think we've got a lot going for us, but I think the outreach to the community needs to be strong.' ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:31 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:31:04 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz - this is a favorite topic. Elmbrook has high standards - always has. Problem is that surrounding communities are starting to meet Elmbrook's excellence. "We're giving parents options to shop around, basically." It used to be that when you were moving into the area, Elmbrook was a no-brainer. "we do need to continue, or become again, the standout shool (district)." Then we'll continue attracting families and good teachers. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:31 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:31:50 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Need to stay competitive and look at programming options. We're looking at cutting programs... that's fine, get rid of the ones that aren't necessary... but consider looking at adding programs to make district stand out. that will help with marketing (marketing is really important). ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:33 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:33:10 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - The way to distinguish as a district is to be the best at what we do. Good education will attract families, teachers and sustain property values and thus the taxbase. Part of becoming outstanding is beefing up core content areas. Teachers and delivery mechanisms for good strategies are in place, but we need high quality literature at all levels, from elem on. Need to encourage mastery of basic math facts and skills. current program is focused on concepts, which are important, but we need computational fluency. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:33 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:33:42 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Those two things - good content and solid math - will open doors for students, who will graduate prepared to take on any career.
<br/>other than that, we need to recognize good teachers. they need encouragement. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:34 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:34:10 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - we're competitive in hiring and retaining teaching staff. pay for new teachers is good. If we're serious about education, good teachers will follow and stay. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:35 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:35:18 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[How do we attract new families? Marketing and publicity is good, but strategic plan's focus is student learning. "If we remain excellent in this regard, if we have top test scores in the area - what do new families look for when they move into an area? Test scores. Test scores."
<br/>That, plus the 'Elmbrook Experience*,' will do the trick.
<br/>(trademark, patent pending) ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:36 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:36:01 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - If we keep striving for excellence and get good programs synced with real-world needs, we'll get good faculty members. Good teachers go to where quality exists, not just good pay. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:36 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:36:44 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - teachers make the biggest impact on students every day. we need to continue to attract good teachers. salary and benefits we offer are competitive and help to attract those teachers. A respectful work environment, supportive board, admins and parents all help make teacher work environments a good place to be. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:37 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:37:38 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Teachers look for a stimulating environment where kids are ready to learn and parents are supportive - we have that.
<br/>In terms of attracting new families - need to market well. Just updated pamphlets that show the high achievieng schools in the district. People are better able to see that, and that's important. We have to keep striving to better education and the programs provided. "We need to be cutting edge, and take a look at the scores." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:37 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:37:59 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Next question: what are the pros and cons of continuing or discontinuing the chapter 220 and open enrollment programs? ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:39 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:39:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz - she'll take OE first: "I believe that when calculated properly, so as to not add cost to the district by adding a new teacher or opening a new section, I do believe that there are significant benefits in revenue."
<br/>The enrollment tool is impressive in showing how many students are best to add for maximum positive revenue with minimal impact on class sizes and additional costs. That will help make well-informed, positive decisions, she says. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:39 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:39:38 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[With 220, she needs to study it more before commenting. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:41 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:41:03 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - echoes Schultz' comments on OE. Opportunities for increased revenue and more efficient use of district buildings.
<br/>A drawback to OE and 220 is that the studetns could come in with unexpected support needs. Resident students have been identified with needs as they've been here.
<br/>Overall, though, nonresidents are a good thing.
<br/>We've got good models, but each has its flaw. Currently, we don't know for sure what our enrollmetn will look like, which makes long-term nonresident planning difficult. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:41 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:41:25 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Chapter 220 could be a financial drain on the district. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:42 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:42:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - Open Enrollment brings in $6,500 in tuition revenue. Almost free money. It can be spent on student learning without adding much cost.
<br/>It's more complicated than that, though, as the enrollment tool has pointed out.
<br/>We could go higher with Open Enrollment and get even more money, but it might not be the best decision. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:42 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:42:49 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[220 is more complicated. Money goes right to the taxpayer in the form of reduced taxpayers. Net effect is the district adds students but doesn't get any additional revenue.
<br/>However, it also adds more diversity. "I think there are significant advantages to that." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:43 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:43:16 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Both programs represent families and students who want to come to Elmbrook. it's like a private school - parents send there kids here because they want their kids to go here. That's good, he says. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:43 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:43:57 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff - won't repeat previous points.
<br/>point of nonresident programs is to add diversity and enrichment.
<br/>he complimented the board regarding its recent decision about open enrollment and the thought that went into it. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:44 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:44:55 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[When you let in a kid, you're opening the door to the whole family, since Elmbrook typically accepts siblings. There's no way of knowing aboutthe problems that could come with those students (I think he means things like learning disabilities and behavioral issues though he didn't actually say that). ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:46 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:46:21 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - we're fortunate Elmbrook is excellent, becase it means that demand for Open Enrollment seats is much higher than the number of seats available.
<br/>Open Enrollment students perform on par with residents. Parents are comitted, because they have to provide transportation.
<br/>There are no gaurantees, but generally they perform well, especially when they're brought here at a young age.
<br/>As long as OE students don't add to district costs, we should open as many seats as possible. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:46 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:46:52 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[This year's decision (107 seats) was wise. Board opened more seats in high school, which means the impact will be shorter-lived (because they'll graduate).
<br/>Nonresidents add diversity, which is good.
<br/>These topics require lots of thought each year. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:47 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:47:31 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - Families that are Open Enrollment or Chapter 220 families - there's an incredible desire on the part of those families to be a part of the district.
<br/>Need to continue offering as many OE seats as possible. It enhances revenue when we need it. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:47 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:47:41 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[In terms of 220, she needs to learn more about the funding side. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:48 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:48:12 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Last prepared question for the evening: What are your thoughts on K4 programs in Elmbrook (candidates laugh). Do you believe they have educational and/or competitive value? ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:49 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:49:22 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Kathryn Wilson - Nothing like ending on a touchy issue, she jokes.
<br/>Research shows K4 doesn't do much for students, academically speaking. Because of that, it's not worth asking for a tax increase for it. She'd rather ask for a tax increase for something else.
<br/>However, if K4 is part of a comprehensive budget solution, it would be worth a look.
<br/>Competitive advantage of having K4 is also a good point, but she'd need to consider data. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:50 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:50:53 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Bob Ziegler - Disagrees... thinks there IS solid evidence that K4 benefits students. However, it might not be sustainable benefit... becaues students in K4 aren't challenged more than non-K4ers once they're in K5.
<br/>"learning that takes placde in 4k can be sustained, I just think we need to raise our standards."
<br/>K4 is the most prevalent issue families bring up to him, and they say they can't believe we don't have it. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:51 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:51:15 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[He supports K4, but he'll wait to hear the enrollment committee's recommendation.
<br/>"If you call that a cop out, then you haven't been on the board of education," he jokes. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:51 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:51:26 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Warren Groff supports K4. But at what cost? he asks. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:51 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:51:54 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[His grandchildren have benefited from it. However, he thinks there are programs (technological ones he's spoken about earlier) that deserve the funding first. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:52 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:52:20 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA["Unless we can support those things that I alluded to so that our graduates can lead to other careers that are just now on the horizon, I'm afraid that I'd be against allocating resources to 4K." ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:53 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:53:52 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer says she's also herad from many residents in K4. People she's spoken to sum it up as having no long term benefit, but would cause tax increase.
<br/>There are long-term ed benefits for disadvantaged kids.
<br/>There are sort-term benefits - educatinoal and social - for advantaged kids.
<br/>By piloting the program, teachers and admins saw the educational benefits. There are financial benefits to K4 - more than $1 million per year, by some estimates, which could support other programs on the chopping block.
<br/>It directly impacts enrollment, so it must be considered alongside other enrollmet issues. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:54 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:54:22 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Currently, more than 80 percent of Wisco districts have K4. How can Elmbrook compete against those districts without K4? she asks. it welcomes families with young children into the district and makes Elmbrook more marketable. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:54 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:54:48 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Genevieve Schmidt - interested in hearing financial ramifications from enrollment management study team. 
<br/>K4 is definitely a draw to young families. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:55 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:55:56 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[People move here because of high quality education, but not having k4 is a deal breaker for some families, she says.
<br/>From a teachers perspective - nation-wide standards for k5ers are high. "That's stuff that I was learning well int0 first and even into second grade."
<br/>K4 gives students a positive perspective on school at an earlier age. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:56 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:56:47 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Sandra Schultz - need to look at K4 as part of the big picture. looking just at components isn't good enough.
<br/>various research shows different results about academic benefit. There are also differing opinions about the impact on home values.
<br/>Bottom line is that if so many public and private schools offer it, Elmbrook should be. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:57 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:57:09 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Enrollment is a huge revenue source, and Elmbrook is losing enrollment to public and private school options that do have K4. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:58:22 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Teachers and admins support it. In the big picture, pros outweigh the cons. She supports K4. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:58:28 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Moderator says we're out of time... no audience questions tonight, though she's inviting audiencde to submit questionos for the next forum. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:58 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:58:51 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Closing comments ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[8:59 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 2:59:39 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Ziegler - He begins by ticking off all the necessary qualifications for board members - good listener, experience, willingness to compromise.
<br/>Exactly six years ago, he said he'd study the issues in a down to earth, even-handed manner and serve as an independent voice for parents and students.
<br/>He wants to do this for another term, but moreso by leveraging his experience and his knowledge. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:00 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:00:17 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Groff - he's got time, he's retired. He's already shared his experience. he's got a driving force. four of five young grandsons are in the district. as long as he's got energy or can make a positive contribution, he'll either serve as a board member or volunteer. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:01 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:01:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Beth Horneffer - Elmbrook is the cornerstone of the community, and it pulls people here. She wants to help nurture and sustain it. She'd bring skills and problem solving ideas, perspective on curriculum, connections at multiple educational levels, academic areas, gifted and talented, sports and the fine arts. She's balanced and able to collaborate with others and be a good listener. Finances are difficult, but there's a chance to be thoughtful, proactive, collaborate and embrace positive change. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:02 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:02:24 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Schimdt - She's interested in being here because she's got support from friends and family, but also becasue she supports board mission for student learning, connectedness to community and fiscal responsibility. She's concerned as a parent and as a taxpayer. Her approach is collaborative. She's got fresh perspective to challenge the status quo. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:03 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:03:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Schultz - Forum was focused on ecomics, but we're talking about studnets. For the past 10 years on the parent network, she's been trying to enhance the overall experience for students. Graduates of the district are the leaders of tomorrow and the hard workers. There are so many different levels of education - need to support kids at all levels. Wants an opportunity to bring strenght and experience to the board. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:04 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:04:55 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Wilson - Financial outlook requires attentiton. Can't solve the problem without impacdting education. Set a goal of the kind of education we want for children and then set financial systems to support it. There are exciting efforts in process - some of which she's a part of (she's listing her committee volunteering). "I bring rich and varied perspective and  experience." Undrestands financial limitations. her family lives with them too. She wants to serve community as a board member. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:05 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:05:44 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Primary will be Tuesday, Feb. 16. The six candidates who spoke tonight will be whittled to four. Each voter can vote for two candidates (since there are two open at-large seats). General election is on April 6. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:08 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:08:17 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[That's the game, folks... Thanks for tuning in.
<br/>
<br/>Want to read more about the candidates? Check out this profile story: <a href="http://www.brookfieldnow.com/news/82793527.html
" target="_blank" >http://www.brookfieldnow.com/news/82793527.html
</a><br/>
<br/>Be sure to keep watching Brookfield - Elm Grove NOW and <a href="http://BrookfieldNOW.com" target="_blank" >BrookfieldNOW.com</a> for continuous election coverage for both the Elmbrook School Board and the race for Brookfield Mayor.
<br/>
<br/>Got any questions for me or the candidates? E-mail them to <a href="mailto:idebruin@cninow.com" target="_blank" >idebruin@cninow.com</a>. ]]></description></item>
<item>
                    <title><![CDATA[9:08 ]]></title>
                   <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 3:08:46 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<div class="clearingspace" style="line-height: 3px;">&nbsp;</div><a href="http://www.coveritlive.com/index.php?option=com_altcaster&task=register&referral_code=LiveBlogReferral" target="_blank"><img src="http://cdnsl.coveritlive.com/templates/coveritlive/images/cil_thanks_en.jpg" border="0" /></a><br><div class="clearingspace" style="line-height: 3px;">&nbsp;</div>]]></description></item></channel></rss>